Comparative evaluation of machine learning model and PAP/CAR approach for water erosion prediction in the Beht watershed, Morocco
			
	
 
More details
Hide details
	
	
									
				1
				Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, Energy, and Sustainable Development (SIEDD), Private University of Fez, Lotissement Quaraouiyine Route Ain Chkef, Fès 30000, Morocco
				 
			 
						
				2
				Functional Ecology and Environmental Engineering Laboratory (LEFGE), Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fes, Morocco
				 
			 
						
				3
				Laboratory of Innovative Materials and Mechanical Manufacturing Processes (IMMM), ENSAM-Meknes, Moulay Ismail University, Marjane 2, BP: 15290, Meknes 50500, Morocco
				 
			 
										
				
				
		
		 
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
							
										    		
    			 
    			
    				    					Corresponding author
    					    				    				
    					Fahed  El Amarty   
    					Functional Ecology and Environmental Engineering Laboratory (LEFGE), Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fes, Morocco
    				
 
    			
				 
    			 
    		 		
			
																																 
		
	 
		
 
 
Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol. 2025; 6:188-204
		
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Soil erosion is a major environmental concern, particularly in hydrologically unstable regions. Reliable prediction methods are essential for effective erosion risk assessment and mitigation. This study evaluates and compares two erosion prediction methodologies in the Beht watershed, Morocco: the traditional PAP/CAR model and an advanced machine learning technique, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and remote sensing data, we integrate various conditioning factors such as slope, elevation, rainfall intensity, and land cover. While the PAP/CAR model provides a qualitative assessment of erosion susceptibility, its limitations in spatial precision necessitate a comparison with data-driven approaches. The results indicate that the PAP/CAR model identifies high-risk erosion zones covering approximately 42.37% of the watershed, but it tends to overestimate spatial distributions. In contrast, the XGBoost model, trained on 70% of inventory data and validated on the remaining 30%, achieves an Accuracy of 90.02%, a Kappa coefficient of 0.6, and an AUC-ROC score of 0.96, demonstrating its superior predictive power. By leveraging optimized hyperparameters, XGBoost enhances classification stability, reducing bias and variance, thereby improving model reliability. These findings emphasize the necessity of integrating advanced computational techniques into geospatial analyses for erosion risk management, offering more precise tools for soil conservation strategies and watershed management.