THE MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT POLISHING IN ULTRAFILTRATION
			
	
 
More details
Hide details
	
	
									
				1
				Politechnika Śląska w Gliwicach, Instytut Inżynierii Wody i Ścieków, ul. Konarskiego 18, 44-100 Gliwice
				 
			 
						
				2
				Politechnika Śląska w Gliwicach, Wydział Inżynierii Środowiska i Energetyki, Katedra Biotechnologii Środowiskowej, ul. Akademicka 2, 44-100 Gliwice
				 
			 
						
				3
				Talmex sp. z o.o., ul. Chopina 94, 43-600 Jaworzno
				 
			 
										
				
				
		
		 
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			
			 
			Publication date: 2017-08-01
			 
		 			
		 
	
							
					    		
    			 
    			
    				    					Corresponding author
    					    				    				
    					Mariusz  Dudziak   
    					Politechnika Śląska w Gliwicach, Instytut Inżynierii Wody i Ścieków, ul. Konarskiego 18, 44-100 Gliwice
    				
 
    			
				 
    			 
    		 		
			
																																 
		
	 
		
 
 
Inż. Ekolog. 2017; 4:40-46
		
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The effluent from the municipal sewage treatment plant was comparatively treated in the ultrafiltration process using ceramic and polymer membranes. Filtration was carried out in the cross-flow system under the conditions of the transmembrane process pressure 0.1 MPa - the ceramic membrane and 0.2 MPa – the polymer membrane at a temperature of 20°C. The effectiveness of the process had been assessed by various physical and chemical analyses (pH, turbidity, color, absorbance, TOC and phenol index). There was included the toxicological assessment (by applying as an indicator organism the bioluminescence bacteria Aliivibrio fischeri) and microbiological assessment of tested samples. During filtration there was studied the hydraulic efficiency of membranes. Is was specified, that the efficiency of the process depends on the conditions of membrane filtration, wherein the better effects of the removal of organic pollutants had been noted in the case of polymer membrane than ceramic membrane. However, the polymer membrane, in the comparison to the ceramic membrane, was more susceptible to pore blocking, which caused the reduction of hydraulic efficiency. Regardless of what type of membrane the permeats were not toxic and did not contain microorganisms.