PL EN
THE EFFECT OF IMPROPER DISPOSAL OF THE RESIDUES OF PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS ON SOIL MICROORGANISMS
 
More details
Hide details
1
Katedra Entomologii, Fitopatologii i Diagnostyki Molekularnej, Uniwersytet Warmińsko Mazurski w Olsztynie, ul. Prawocheńskiego 17, 10- 720 Olsztyn
 
 
Publication date: 2015-11-15
 
 
Inż. Ekolog. 2015; 45:93-98
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
New legislation emphasizes the importance of proper disposal of the residues of plant protection products in farms in the agricultural and horticultural sector, because some of those residues may remain in soil in unchanged form for several years, thus affecting the biodiversity of soil microorganisms. A questionnaire survey was conducted to determine the methods of application and disposal of plant protection products by professional users. Biodiversity of microbial communities in soil at sites contaminated by xenobiotics from point sources was evaluated in a laboratory experiment. The awareness of the users of plant protection products regarding responsible and safe use of approved sprayers and the need to train persons performing protective treatments was satisfactory. However, the respondents demonstrated a low level of environmental awareness, and they often declared that in their farms the residues of plant protection products are disposed of in the same place repeatedly. Such practices reduce the biodiversity of soil-dwelling microbes, in particular, the counts of nitrogen-fixing bacteria. In most cases, fungi of the genus Mucor and the species of Fusarium culmorum and Gliocladium roseum did not respond to the presence of the residues of plant protection products in soil.
 
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Baćmaga M., Kucharski J., Wyszkowska J., 2015. Microbial and enzymatic activity of soil contaminated with azoxystrobin. Environ Monit Assess 187, 615–630.
 
2.
Hołownicki R., Doruchowski G., Godoń A., 2011. Technika ochrony roślin w dyrektywach UE. Inżynieria Rolna 4(129), 75–84.
 
3.
Jarecki W., Bobrecka-Jarmo D., 2013. Zużycie środków ochrony roślin w Polsce w kontekście retardacji przemian rolniczej przestrzeni produkcyjnej. Inżynieria Ekologiczna 34, 121–128.
 
4.
Jastrzębska E., Kucharski J., 2005. Liczebność drobnoustrojów w glebie zanieczyszczonej fungicydami. Mat. 39 Konferencji Mikrobiologii Gleby. Kobyla Góra -Wrocław, 5-8 wrzesień 2005, 67–68.
 
5.
King E., Ward M. K, Raney DE 1954. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 44, 301–307.
 
6.
Komárek M., Čadkorá E., Chrasty V., Bordas F., Bollinger J.C., 2010. Contamination of vineyard soil with fungicides: A review of environmental and toxicological aspects. Environmental International 36, 138–151.
 
7.
Martin J.P. 1950. Use of acid, rose Bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi, Soil Science, 38, 215–220.
 
8.
Martyniuk S., Martyniuk M., 2003. Occurrence of Azotobacter spp. in Polish soil. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 12(3), 371–374.
 
9.
Martyniuk, S., Ksiezniak, A., Jonczyk, K., Kus, J., 2007. Microbiological characteristics of soil under winter wheat cultivated in ecological and conventional systems. J Res Appl Agric Eng, 52, 113–116.
 
10.
Muñoz-Leoz B., Ruiz-Romera E., Antiguedad I., Garbisu C., 2011. Tebuconazole application decreases soil microbial biomass anactivity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43(10), 2176–2183.
 
11.
Pruszyński S., Skrzypczak G. 2007. Ochrona roślin w zrównoważonym rolnictwie. Frag. Agron. 4(96), 127–138.
 
12.
Rocznik Statystyki Międzynarodowej GUS 2012. stat.gov.pl/cps/rde/.../gus/RS_rocznik_stat_miedzy-narodowy_2012.pdf.
 
13.
Silva E. d O., Furtado N.A.J.C., Aleu J., Collado I.G., 2014. Non-terpenoid biotransformations by Mucor species. Phytochem Rev. DOI 10.1007/s11101-014-9374-0.
 
14.
Ustawa z dnia 8 marca 2013 r. o środkach ochrony roślin, Dz.U. 2013 poz. 455.
 
15.
Wrzosek J., Gworek B., Marciaszek D., 2009. Środki ochrony roślin w aspekcie ochrony środowiska. Ochr. Środ. Zasob. Natur. 39, 75–88.
 
16.
Wyszkowska J., Kucharski J., 2004. Biologiczne właściwości gleby zanieczyszczonej Chwastoxem Trio 540 SL. Rocz. Gleb., 50, 311–319.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top